America Articles Big Lie Big Pharma Biology Black Projects Blowback Bodily Autonomy Cancer Catastrophe Censorship Centers For Disease Control Chemicals Children Civil Disobedience Civil Rights Cognitive Dissonance Conflict Of Interest Consciousness Corporations Corruption Courage Crimes Crimes Against Humanity Crony Capitalism Deep State Direct Actions Divide And Conquer Doctors Domestic Terrorism Drug Pushers Dumb Us Down Economics Education Entrapment Espionage Eugenics Externalities Fact Check Family Fear Finance Food And Drug Administration Frauds Freedom And Liberty Freedom Fighter Future Gambling Gaslighting Genocide Globalists Government Hate Crimes Health History Iatrogenic Inalienable Rights Informed Consent Ingenious Inspiration Jews Journalism Laws Lobbyists Mathematics Medical Money Never Give Up New World Order Nurses Political Propaganda Protests Psychology Satanic Science Slavery Soul Surveillance Talmud Technology Theft They Live Totalitarianism United States Unvaccinated Vaccine Passports VAERS War Whistleblowers

Cancer Alert: Conventional Cancer Treatment Shortens Lifespan, According To Study by Lori Alton

In his earlier paper, Dr. Jones illustrated how cancer study results were skewed to conclude that treated patients fared better. For example, patients who died while receiving treatment were not included in the results, giving an unrealistically rosier picture of the survival rate of treated patients. In his 1969 presentation, the professor pointed out that research continued to shift results in favor of treatment. For example, patients whose cancer was extremely advanced were routinely placed in the group not receiving treatment. This left more patients who were less seriously impacted in the treated group, resulting in a higher survival rate. Once this bias was statistically corrected, Dr. Jones found that the survival rates among untreated patients were greater than among the patients undergoing treatment. Dr. Jones determined that survival among people with breast cancer was four times longer when conventional treatment was refused. Such patients typically lived an average of 12 1/2 years, compared to those undergoing treatment who lived only three years on average, leading the cancer researcher to conclude that without a doubt, radical surgery did more harm to cancer patients than it did good. Meanwhile, FACT™ points out, there has been no published work refuting the evidence presented by Dr. Jones. On the contrary, his conclusions have been supported by the work of other recognized researchers. Among them was Massachusetts Institute of Technology biologist Dr. Maurice Fox who published his paper in 1979 stating that radical mastectomy did not bring about better survival rates than simple lump removal. He also wrote that patients opting out of medical procedures actually had a lower mortality rate than those who chose to undergo treatment. Further, patients who received early diagnoses died even sooner, likely due to the duration and intensity of treatment.
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/conventional-cancer-treatment-3978.html

If You Find EarthNewspaper.com Informative, Please Make A Contribution
Donate today and support the work I do seven days a week. Each day I publish more than a dozen news articles and videos, from honest, independent and reliable sources, on a completely ad-free website. There are four ways you may donate: credit card, check, bank wire, or SubscriberStar. I, Mark R. Elsis, thank you in advance for your gracious generosity, so that EarthNewspaper.com All The Honest News Fit To Publish may keep growing quickly.
https://earthnewspaper.com/donate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.