Anti-Defamation League Anti-Semitism Articles Big Lie Blowback Censorship Corruption Courage Crimes Against Humanity Frauds Freedom And Liberty Government Inspiration Jews John W. Whitehead Journalism Laws Political Propaganda Sanctions Satanic Talmud Texas Theft They Live War

Rutherford Institute Challenges Anti-Boycott Law, Denounces Attempt By Texas Officials To Muzzle Political Viewpoints

Houston, Texas – The Rutherford Institute is denouncing as unconstitutional an attempt by Texas officials to muzzle political viewpoints expressed in the form of boycotts and protests. Weighing in before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in A&R Engineering and Testing, Inc. v. Paxton, Rutherford Institute attorneys are challenging a Texas anti-boycott law that prohibits the government from doing business with companies that boycott or criticize Israel. Approximately 33 states have adopted laws that seek to punish those who criticize Israel by denying them government contracts.
“Boycotts are a protected part of the American tradition of political protest that dates back to the American Revolution, when early Americans expressed their outrage over Britain’s oppressive taxes and military occupation by staging boycotts of British goods and organizing public protests, mass meetings, parades, and other demonstrations,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “Anti-boycott laws are a thinly disguised plot to muzzle dissent, silence those who would challenge government authority, and undermine our First Amendment rights, which assure us of the right to free speech, expressive activities, protest, and the right to criticize the government.”
Anti-BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) laws, which have gained traction across the country, restrict government funds being paid to persons or entities who boycott Israel or take any action intended to penalize or inflict economic harm on Israel, such as by giving speeches or sponsoring protests against Israel. Anti-BDS laws have arisen in response to a political movement that seeks to apply international, nonviolent pressure on Israel so long as it occupies the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem, and further seeks to achieve full equality for Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel. The state of Texas, which has been actively courting business with Israel for the past few years, first enacted an anti-BDS Law in 2017, which prohibits government agencies from doing business with companies that boycott Israel.
by Rutherford Institute

John W. Whitehead Rutherford Institute Archive

Subscribe To The Newsletter

Support Honest, Independent, And Ad-Free News

2 Replies to “Rutherford Institute Challenges Anti-Boycott Law, Denounces Attempt By Texas Officials To Muzzle Political Viewpoints

  1. You would imagine that the law would prohibit governments doing business with corporations which have been convicted for hundreds of frauds and been fined billions, the highest fines in history, but yet the world’s government’s have been in bed with criminal Pfizer regardless of millions of citizens protests.

  2. Says a lot about who is in charge in America that Israel the # one terrorist state in the world, the least moral nation on earth can’t be criticized.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.